|
PRESS RELEASE - 10th MARCH, 2004
Edition
32.
Cannabis News Items From Around the World
MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND ITS WITLESS ENEMIES
URL:http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n351/a07.html
Newshawk:
Pubdate: Sun, 29 Feb 2004
Source: Chicago Tribune (IL)
Copyright: 2004 Chicago Tribune Company
Contact: ctc-TribLetter@Tribune.com
Website: http://www.chicagotribune.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/82
Author: Steve Chapman
Note: This follows Saturday's medical cannabis editorial http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n344/a07.html and lengthy LTE http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04.n345.a07.html
Related: Illinois Drug Education and Legislative Reform http://www.idealreform.org/
Related: Medical Marijuana Poll Analysis http://www.ohiopatient.net/projects/Poll_Analysis.htm
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/bush.htm (Bush, George)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/John+Kerry
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/John+Edwards
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Bill+Clinton
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/ashcroft.htm (Ashcroft, John)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Andrea+Barthwell
MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND ITS WITLESS ENEMIES
Anti-Drug Advocates Continue to Ignore Credible Science
Modern cancer treatments have saved countless lives, but they can be a
cruelly mixed blessing. Chemotherapy, often indispensable in curing
cancer, sometimes is enough to make you ill, causing violent nausea
and vomiting.
Luckily, there is a well-established and safe remedy recommended by
many cancer physicians that sometimes provides relief when nothing
else can. Not so luckily, the remedy is marijuana. Under federal law,
cannabis is forbidden--even for therapeutic use by seriously ill
people who have no more interest in getting high than they do in
bungee jumping. The Bush administration, in its generosity, is willing
to let these patients have any medicine except the one they need.
In the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, John Kerry
and John Edwards often sound nearly indistinguishable on the issues.
But when it comes to medical marijuana, there is plenty of space
between them. Edwards sounds like President Bush, while Kerry has
dared to suggest that the established federal policy has been a grave
mistake.
Under the Carter administration, the federal government recognized the
medical potential of cannabis and set up a "compassionate use program"
that not only allowed some patients to use pot but gave them a supply.
This humane concession, however, didn't survive the first Bush
administration, which slammed the door on new patients.
Anyone expecting better from Bill Clinton, that child of the '60s, was
doomed to disappointment. The president who didn't inhale made sure no
Republican could portray him as soft on drugs. His administration
refused to change federal policy and vehemently crusaded against state
measures legalizing medical marijuana.
The current Bush administration has been equally horrified by the idea
that marijuana could be anything but evil. Not long after the Sept.
11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when you might have thought the Justice
Department had more urgent priorities, federal agents continued
raiding "cannabis clubs" that furnish pot to patients whose doctors
have prescribed it, in accordance with state law.
As if it weren't enough to dictate what goes into patients' mouths,
U.S. Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft also took it upon himself to dictate
what could come out of doctors' mouths: The administration made it
illegal for physicians to prescribe or even discuss marijuana with
their patients as a treatment.
But the administration's campaign has lately run off the rails. Last
year, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said the policy was
unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court let that decision stand. Then,
the same appeals court ordered an end to the prosecution of California
cannabis club patients and suppliers.
The court ruled that the matter was a state concern beyond the
legitimate reach of the federal government. Conservatives, who have
often applauded the Supreme Court's decisions reinvigorating the power
of states against the encroachments of Washington, were surprised to
find that the same doctrine could be used to corral a conservative
administration.
But that hasn't stopped the president's lieutenants from pursuing
their vendetta. Andrea Barthwell, deputy director of the White House
Office on National Drug Control Policy, denounced the 9th Circuit's
reasoning. "There is no scientific evidence that qualifies smoked
marijuana to be called medicine," she declared.
Her opinion rejects the view of many medical professionals, including
those at the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, which has
called for rescinding the federal ban. It also ignores a 1999 report
by the Institute of Medicine at the National Academy of Sciences, a
federal body, which recognized "the potential therapeutic value of
cannabinoid drugs for pain relief, control of nausea and vomiting, and
appetite stimulation."
It's true that there may be safer and better ways to ingest the drug
than by smoking it. But anyone who believes that should favor
extensive federal research into alternative systems--something that
has not been of great interest to the Bush administration.
The next administration might be better, or it might not. John Edwards
has rejected marijuana as medicine while endorsing the federal raids
on cannabis clubs. John Kerry, however, supports federal legislation
allowing the medical use of marijuana with a doctor's approval. Asked
last year if he would halt the Drug Enforcement Administration raids,
he didn't give one of those long-winded answers that Edwards has
mocked. His reply was a model of brevity: "Yes."
On this issue, Kerry is in perfect step with public opinion. Ten
states have legalized medical marijuana, and more than 30 have passed
resolutions in favor of it. Polls indicate that the great majority of
Americans think cannabis should be available for whatever medical
value it has.
But Bush and Edwards want to continue a vindictive policy that ignores
the experience of medical professionals, shortchanges science and
treats suffering people as criminals.
It's enough to make you ill.
'HIGH TIMES' POST-9/11
Pubdate: Sat, 21 Feb 2004
Source: Newsday (NY)
Copyright: 2004 Newsday Inc.
Contact: letters@newsday.com
Website: http://www.newsday.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/308
Author: Ellis Henican
Cited: High Times http://www.hightimes.com
'HIGH TIMES' POST-9/11
Richard Stratton knows what it's like to run a magazine with unconventional
demographics. Before he took over as publisher and editor-in-chief
of High Times, he ran Prison Life, a beloved but now
dead journal for men and women behind bars.
A fascinating subject, for sure - but not exactly the upscale
population that most advertisers seek. "The readers didn't
have much money to spend," Stratton conceded with a smile.
"And they couldn't
get out to the store."
Well, compared to that captive audience, how hard can the just-say-yes
crowd be?
So Stratton, who himself did eight years in prison on a marijuana-smuggling
conviction, has now turned his attention to the venerable marijuana
magazine. This is one readership that has a proven
history of spending on its cravings, legal and otherwise. The
mission: Deliver High Times, kicking and screaming if necessary,
into the post-9/11, John Ashcroft world.
"The High Times sensibility is libertarian - more than left-wing
or right-wing," Stratton was saying at week's end. "It's
a lifestyle magazine for people who don't think the government
should tell them
how to live," whether they choose to get high or not.
"It's the whole outlaw attitude," added his editor,
Annie Nocenti. "And it's a fundamental part of the American
character."
The two of them, Stratton and Nocenti, are sitting together in
the magazine's lofty office on Park Avenue South. Stratton is
solid and squinting and his face is well-lined. The past few years,
he's made a serious name for himself at the gritty end of the
TV-and-movie world. (Showtime's "Street Time," the film
"Slam.") He tends to mumble.
Nocenti, a screenwriter and celebrated comic-book author who was
an editor at Scenario magazine and Prison Life, is the extrovert
in the room, tossing off ideas and quick opinions. Along with
executive editor John Buffalo Mailer, a budding playwright and
the famous novelist's 26-year-old son, they are asking themselves:
Can a pot magazine still matter today?
"We have this 30-year-old brand name known around the world,"
Stratton says. "But we have to be more than a pot magazine."
So comedian Dave Chappelle is on the cover this month, anchoring
a package on race. Other pieces touch on white supremacists and
the terrorist-detention center at Guantanamo Bay. Yes, there are
still ads for rolling papers and grow lights.
Stratton and his crew have decided to split the old High Times
franchise into two magazines: The newly launched Grow is a tightly
focused trade magazine for the serious marijuana cultivator, packed
with helpful hints on seed selection and irrigation techniques.
That has freed High Times to broaden its scope.
"We want to elevate our argument beyond 'Yo, babes, bongs
and the right to smoke,' " Nocenti said.
"The question is: What kind of world do you want to live
in?" Stratton said. "A world where people go to prison
for small amounts of drugs?"
In 1974, he was part of the informal brain trust around the magazine's
late founder, fellow pot smuggler Tom Forcade. "The magazine
was really created as a marketing tool," Stratton said. "A
load of Colombian pot had come into the city. The challenge was,
'How are you going to educate the market about what this stuff
is?' Start a magazine!"
Over the years, High Times became a Hagstrom's for the youth culture,
a practical road map for stoners and their friends, treading a
wavy line just this side of the drug laws. The magazine created
and continues to host the Cannabis Cup, an Oscars for pot growers
held each fall in Amsterdam.
The magazine was almost silenced several times by various branches
of Washington's War on (some) Drugs. Police and prosecutors circled,
using terms like "ancillary criminal enterprise." Advertisers
were squeezed. But the magazine puffed on.
Since Stratton and his group took over late last year, they've
thrust High Times back into the broader countercultural buzz.
The magazine is opening a Los Angeles office next week. There's
talk of High Times movies and TV projects. The magazine is publishing
a protest guide to this summer's Republican National Convention
in New York. On Thursday night, the editors hosted a hip-hop summit,
tied to pieces on race.
And marijuana becomes almost a metaphor.
Comedian Tommy Chong was sent to jail last year for manufacturing
smoking paraphernalia, Richard Stratton recalled. "A lot
of people have a real problem with government power being used
that way, even people who don't use drugs. We'll keep highlighting
that kind of thing."
"You can almost compare the magazine to marijuana itself,"
said Nocenti, before heading back to work. "People have tried
to stamp it out. They've never been able to. It's a weed that
grows naturally. It just keeps coming back."
West Oz Industry praises hemp bill as major boost for retailers
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1059423.htm
Pubdate: 5th March, 2004
A Western Australia hemp retailer has welcomed the passage of the industrial hemp bill through the State's Parliament.
The legislation allows for the commercial cultivation and processing of industrial hemp under licence to make textiles and oil, and follows trials in the south-west of the State and the Kimberley.
The co-owner of the Margaret River Hemp Company, Georgina Wilkinson, says it will be a major boost for hemp retailers and could mean cheaper prices for consumers.
"We think it's absolutely great. It's been going on for a long time now and compared to other states here in Australia we're actually a long way behind. So it's quite good to actually catch up to everybody else," she said.
"And we actually buy all our fabrics from overseas and get people to make it here in Australia. But obviously it would be a lot better if we could make it here in Australia ourselves."
Greens MLC Christine Sharp says the industry has enormous potential if the Government does its part.
"Removing the legal impediment to the growing of hemp in Western Australia is great, but it is certainly not enough for us to have a successful hemp industry," Ms Sharp said.
"And we now need a massive amount of research to find the right strains of hemp for growing in WA."
CAN TAKING CANNABIS MAKE YOU AN EVEN BETTER DRIVER?
Pubdate: Sat, 24 Jan 2004
Source: Evening News (UK)
Copyright: 2004 Archant Regional
Contact: EveningNewsLetters@archant.co.uk
Website: http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/141
Section: Motoring Supplement
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/cannabis+driving
CAN TAKING CANNABIS MAKE YOU AN EVEN BETTER DRIVER?
While no responsible person would ever advocate the use of drugs
for drivers, tests using a recently developed video game called
Burnout have thrown up some surprise statistics.
The testers found that a moderate amount of cannabis actually
improved driving performance among those they studied.
Results from another recent study apparently also show that people
drive both faster and safer while under the influence of the drug.
A group of 20 drivers aged 21-40 were recruited for the Burnout
study, all of whom had not previously owned a video games machine
or described themselves of players of video games.
Ten of them smoked approximately 0.15 milligrams of cannabis,
equivalent to about half a "joint".
The other half declared that they had not had any stimulant for
at least 72 hours before the test.
They were then given a thorough demonstration of Burnout and were
subsequently asked to take the controls and play the video game
themselves.
Participants' skills at different elements of the game - reaction
times, speed, concentration levels and road safety - were thoroughly
analysed and evaluated.
The results showed that for those who had smoked 0.15 mgs of cannabis:
* 80 per cent demonstrated superior reaction times * 60 per cent
finished a lap faster * 70 per cent experienced a lower number
of collisions * 60 per cent reached a higher level in the game.
The cannabis takers were then pitched against the non-cannabis
takers in a head-to-head challenge on Burnout.
In this competitive setting, the cannabis users came out on top
in eight out of ten of the match-ups.
The drivers under the influence of cannabis appeared to have more
confidence in their ability and be much calmer. Burnout is aid
to be "a fast-paced and adrenalin-stoked" game and the
cannabis could have helped keep them in control of their nerves..
For the second stage of the experiment, the group who had already
smoked cannabis smoked some more, increasing their total intake
to about 0.58 milligrams, equatting to approximately two "joints".
The driver performance on Burnout then showed a significant decrease.
With a total of 0.58 milligrams of cannabis in their system:
* 60 per cent demonstrated superior reaction times * 30 per cent
finished the game faster * 40 per cent experienced a lower number
of collisions * 20 per cent reached a higher level in the game.
In the second part of the challenges, the cannabis smokers won
only three races against their non-cannabis counterparts, an indicator
of worsening driving performance.
Simon smith Wright, Burnout's Communications Director, said: "The
results of our test clearly show indicate that a small or moderate
amount of cannabis is actually quite beneficial to someone's driving
performance.
"Further amounts then tend to start to impinge on performance,
although interestingly reactions times appear to best withstand
the increased amount of the drug in the system.
"Obviously Burnout is a video game and whilst extremely realistic,
we cannot claim that these findings translate to real life driving,
nor are we encouraging anyone to try out the theory."
The RAC's position is that, in every circumstance, the drug is
detrimental to anyone at the wheel.
GOVT KICKS OFF HIGH SCHOOL CANNABIS EDUCATION KIT
Newshawk: JimmyG
Pubdate: Sun, 29 Feb 2004
Source: Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Australia Web)
Copyright: 2004 Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Contact: comments@your.abc.net.au
Website: http://www.abc.net.au/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/34
GOVT KICKS OFF HIGH SCHOOL CANNABIS EDUCATION KIT
Two cannabis education kits launched by the New South Wales Government
this weekend are a first in Australia.
The kits, which have been developed for high schools, are part
of a drive to highlight the dangers of cannabis use and change
the perception that it is a safe recreational drug.
NSW Special Minister of State John Della Bosca says the State
Government is serious about tackling the issue in the education
system.
"It's the first kit of its kind in Australia, it's part
of a comprehensive strategy which is the first serious attempt
by government to address the problem of cannabis in young people
from a public health perspective," he said.
"We've established cannabis clinics, these are a world first
specialising in providing counselling and medical assistance for
young people using and abusing cannabis."
POLICE GIVEN POWERS TO SEARCH KING'S CROSS CAFE FOR
DRUGS WITHOUT WARRANT
Newshawk: JimmyG
Pubdate: Tue, 02 Mar 2004
Source: Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Australia Web)
Copyright: 2004 Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Contact: comments@your.abc.net.au
Website: http://www.abc.net.au/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/34
POLICE GIVEN POWERS TO SEARCH CAFE FOR DRUGS WITHOUT WARRANT
New South Wales police now have the power to look for illegal
drugs in a so-called "cannabis cafe" in Kings Cross
without a getting a search warrant.
Police say the Bliss Cafe has been declared a restricted premises
by the Supreme Court, which allows officers to search for drugs
at any time.
The Police Minister John Watkins says it will help police to close
cafes where cannabis is sold.
"It is the first time that this power has been exercised
by the Supreme Court after an application by police and it means
police now have very strong powers to move against this cafe when
they believe
that drugs are being sold," he said.
U.S. Government Report Exposes Deceitful White House “Marijuana
Treatment” Claims
March 2, 2004
Countering bogus claims by White House Drug Czar John Walters
that hundreds of thousands of marijuana addicts are flocking to
drug treatment, a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
report shows that 82.5% of people seeking treatment for marijuana
– a stunning majority – are doing so only because
of government coercion. The report shows that many of those in
treatment for marijuana do not enter because of problems with
the drug but because they are first-time offenders arrested for
marijuana possession who have been given the option by a judge
or drug court to choose drug treatment or jail.
According to the government report, fifty-seven percent of the
255,000 individuals admitted for primary marijuana treatment in
2001 were referred by the criminal justice system – that
is, they chose treatment over jail. Many of these individuals
are youth who have been caught with the drug. Admissions involving
primary marijuana and no alcohol increased by an astonishing 520%
from 1992-2001, the nine-year period covered by the report, and
made up 15% of all admissions. This highlights the astonishing
time and cost spent targeting marijuana users in the taxpayer
funded "war on drugs". In the final year of the report,
800,000 Americans were arrested on marijuana charges – most
of these are arrested for possession.
Major UK Reform of Marijuana Policy Has Taken Effect
Pubdate: 29th January, 2004
Major UK Reform of Marijuana Policy to Take Effect Today,
Most Will No Longer Be Charged for Personal Possession
Majority of British Public in Favor of Decriminalization or Legalization,
Says New Poll
U.S. Increasingly Isolated in Costly War on Marijuana
For Immediate Release: Thursday, January 29, 2004. Contact:
Tony Newman 212-613-8026 or Elizabeth Berry 212-613-8036
Thursday January 29 – In what CNN called "the biggest
shake-up of Britain's drug laws in 30 years," a new marijuana
policy will take effect today in the UK, disallowing most people
in possession of small quantities of cannabis to be arrested.
A January 26 Daily Telegraph/YouGov Poll found that the reform
had widespread public support. The poll, one of the United Kingdom’s
largest ever investigations into public attitudes on drugs, found
that a majority of those surveyed not only supported the new law,
but were in favor either of complete decriminalization or legalization
of marijuana. The British public also dismissed many of the U.S.
government’s arguments made against marijuana: that it is
a gateway drug that leads to “harder” drugs, that
it is seriously addictive, and that marijuana users are violent
criminals.
Specific poll results include:
52% of respondents support the new legislation disallowing arrests
for most cases of cannabis possession
51% believe that marijuana should be either decriminalized (28%)
or legalized (23%)
87% do not believe that marijuana creates a craving for harder
drugs
Marijuana ranks 8th in terms of perceived addictiveness, behind
tobacco, alcohol, and coffee
"We hope that U.S. politicians will learn from their British
counterparts," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of
the Drug Policy Alliance. "As our closest allies start to
recover from the failure of cannabis prohibition, we look more
and more like a friend in serious denial."
Today’s legal change, which will place Britain in the majority
of Western European nations in easing marijuana laws, will be
achieved by re-classifying cannabis from a class “B”
to a class “C” drug. Instead of arrest – and
possibly jail – most people found in possession of small
quantities of marijuana will be given a warning, a caution or
a summons to court. The government action followed recommendations
of a parliamentary committee in May 2002, and a 2001 report by
the Police Foundation last year, which concluded that the penalties
for marijuana possession in Britain— the harshest in Europe—did
more damage than the drug itself, by wasting police resources
and saddling otherwise law-abiding citizens with a criminal record.
Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to enforce and even step up their
failed marijuana policy, spending more and more taxpayer money
on policies that don’t work. This weekend, for example,
the Office of National Drug Control Policy will unveil a new pair
of costly television ads that target teenage marijuana use during
the Superbowl and Survivor: All Stars. This media blitz is part
of the ONDCP’s $150 million taxpayer-funded media budget.
Previous ads compared American marijuana users to terrorists.
"Roughly 700,000 Americans are busted on marijuana charges
every year, almost all of which are for possession alone,"
continued Nadelmann. "They can even lose their jobs or student
loans or access to public housing. Alcohol prohibition did more
harm than good. The same is true for marijuana prohibition."
The British public rejected key elements of the ONDCP’s
alarmist rhetoric in the Daily Telegraph/YouGov Poll. Conducted
by one of Britain’s most respected pollsters, the poll included
more than 2,500 participants. It found that the majority of respondents
thought of cannabis as less addictive than legal drugs like coffee,
alcohol, and cigarettes. The majority (74%) also did not think
that cannabis users were a lot more likely to use hard drugs.
If a cannabis user also used hard drugs, the vast majority of
respondents (83%) felt that it was not a result of cannabis creating
a craving for harder drugs, but that they did so because "cannabis
users find themselves part of a ‘drug culture’ with
dealers pushing both hard and soft drugs." They also didn’t
think of drugs as making addicts mentally unstable and therefore
likely to commit crimes; any crime they associated with drugs
they saw as the result of addicts stealing to get money to buy
them.
In the U.S., marijuana, along with heroin and LSD, is classified
as a "Schedule I" drug, despite substantial evidence
that it is less harmful than tobacco or alcohol. The majority
of western European countries -- including Switzerland, Spain,
Belgium and Portugal -- have eliminated criminal penalties for
cannabis possession, consumption, or both. In The Netherlands,
sale of small quantities of cannabis is permitted in coffee shops.
Switzerland has proposed a law that allows for the regulated sale
and production of cannabis, putting the country on the cutting
edge of reform in Europe.
THAT'S ALL FOR NOW FOLKS!
Back
to THE CANNABIS NEWS INDEX
|